<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>S. Matthew Liao &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smatthewliao.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smatthewliao.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 04:43:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Buck-Passing Account of Value: Lessons from Crisp</title>
		<link>http://www.smatthewliao.com/2009/10/01/the-buck-passing-account-of-value-lessons-from-crisp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smatthewliao.com/2009/10/01/the-buck-passing-account-of-value-lessons-from-crisp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smatthewliao.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T. M. Scanlon’s buck-passing account of value (BPA) has been subjected to a barrage of criticisms. Recently, to be helpful to BPA, Roger Crisp has suggested that a number of these criticisms can be met if one makes some revisions to BPA. In this paper, I argue that if advocates of the buck-passing account accepted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T. M. Scanlon’s buck-passing account of value (BPA) has been subjected to a barrage of criticisms.  Recently, to be helpful to BPA, Roger Crisp has suggested that a number of these criticisms can be met if one makes some revisions to BPA.  In this paper, I argue that if advocates of the buck-passing account accepted these revisions, they would effectively be giving up the buck-passing account as it is typically understood, that is, as an account concerned with the conceptual priority of reasons or the right vis-à-vis value or the good.  I conclude by addressing some of the broader implications of my arguments for the current debate about the buck-passing account of value. [<a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/u3k25264n5u62853/?p=1ff9ce7660f04b7f940be8f7aa24a199&#038;pi=1">Philosophical Studies</a>, forthcoming] [<a href="http://www.smatthewliao.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/liao_buckpassing.pdf">pdf</a> | <a href="http://www.smatthewliao.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/liao_buckpassing.htm">html</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smatthewliao.com/2009/10/01/the-buck-passing-account-of-value-lessons-from-crisp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
